Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Saturday, February 21, 2009
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration, siding with the Bush White House, contended Friday that detainees in Afghanistan have no constitutional rights.
In a two-sentence court filing, the Justice Department said it agreed that detainees at Bagram Airfield cannot use U.S. courts to challenge their detention. The filing shocked human rights attorneys.
"The hope we all had in President Obama to lead us on a different path has not turned out as we'd hoped," said Tina Monshipour Foster, a human rights attorney representing a detainee at the Bagram Airfield. "We all expected better."
The Supreme Court last summer gave al-Qaida and Taliban suspects held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the right to challenge their detention. With about 600 detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan and thousands more held in Iraq, courts are grappling with whether they, too, can sue to be released.
and later
The government also said if the Bagram detainees got access to the courts, it would allow all foreigners captured by the United States in conflicts worldwide to do the same.
reassuring to know they're thinking ahead
It's not the first time that the Obama administration has used a Bush administration legal argument after promising to review it. Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder announced a review of every court case in which the Bush administration invoked the state secrets privilege, a separate legal tool it used to have lawsuits thrown out rather than reveal secrets.
The same day, however, Justice Department attorney Douglas Letter cited that privilege in asking an appeals court to uphold dismissal of a suit accusing a Boeing Co. subsidiary of illegally helping the CIA fly suspected terrorists to allied foreign nations that tortured them.
Letter said that Obama officials approved his argument.
In a two-sentence court filing, the Justice Department said it agreed that detainees at Bagram Airfield cannot use U.S. courts to challenge their detention. The filing shocked human rights attorneys.
"The hope we all had in President Obama to lead us on a different path has not turned out as we'd hoped," said Tina Monshipour Foster, a human rights attorney representing a detainee at the Bagram Airfield. "We all expected better."
The Supreme Court last summer gave al-Qaida and Taliban suspects held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the right to challenge their detention. With about 600 detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan and thousands more held in Iraq, courts are grappling with whether they, too, can sue to be released.
and later
The government also said if the Bagram detainees got access to the courts, it would allow all foreigners captured by the United States in conflicts worldwide to do the same.
reassuring to know they're thinking ahead
It's not the first time that the Obama administration has used a Bush administration legal argument after promising to review it. Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder announced a review of every court case in which the Bush administration invoked the state secrets privilege, a separate legal tool it used to have lawsuits thrown out rather than reveal secrets.
The same day, however, Justice Department attorney Douglas Letter cited that privilege in asking an appeals court to uphold dismissal of a suit accusing a Boeing Co. subsidiary of illegally helping the CIA fly suspected terrorists to allied foreign nations that tortured them.
Letter said that Obama officials approved his argument.
Friday, February 20, 2009
wow. some guy on bill moyers just said that the pursuit of happiness is really the pursuit of reality because illusion never makes us happy.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Thursday, February 05, 2009
AWESOME NEWS TODAY!
News Corp. suffers net loss of $6.4 billion
The media conglomerate owned by billionaire Rupert Murdoch says its results for its second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, 'are a direct reflection of the grim economic climate.'
I wonder what Murdoch sees in his mirror.
Is the news a direct reflection of what people want to hear?
Is it supposed to be?
No. It's supposed to help us, and push us, and enlighten us, and inform us, and prevent things like this from happening. Asshole. Fucker. You're just a fucking asshole Murdoch. A huge asshole, like many others. Nothing special. Well, I guess you are kind of a special huge asshole. Real fucking special.
News Corp. suffers net loss of $6.4 billion
The media conglomerate owned by billionaire Rupert Murdoch says its results for its second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, 'are a direct reflection of the grim economic climate.'
I wonder what Murdoch sees in his mirror.
Is the news a direct reflection of what people want to hear?
Is it supposed to be?
No. It's supposed to help us, and push us, and enlighten us, and inform us, and prevent things like this from happening. Asshole. Fucker. You're just a fucking asshole Murdoch. A huge asshole, like many others. Nothing special. Well, I guess you are kind of a special huge asshole. Real fucking special.